![]() ![]() Even God of War: Ragnarök, which Sony describes as its "biggestĮver first-party title" could not compare. Going into more detail on this today, Sony stated its own development costs were "small in comparison to Call of Duty". Sony's response, meanwhile, seeks to largely reinforce what the CMA has said already, including the regulator's earlier finding that there were "few franchises as enduring and as significant in terms of PlayStation's revenue and gameplay time" as Call of Duty, and that any attempt to create a fresh rival would have "a low chance of success". ![]() "Sony's position must be seen for what it is: a self-serving attempt to protect its dominant market position, rather than one founded on genuine concerns regarding its continued access to COD - which it could have secured months ago," Microsoft wrote. Microsoft has its own response, which largely seeks to contradict and (in its view) correct the CMA's provisional findings that concluded with the suggestion Microsoft may need to structurally change the deal in order to get it approved.Īs expected, Microsoft repeats the statement that it will not seek to hinder or withold access to Call of Duty on PlayStation in any way. ![]() Sony's response is one of several published today by the CMA as part of its ongoing process to evaluate Microsoft's Activision Blizzard deal. "Destiny, SIE's main active first-person shooter franchise, had only of the gameplay hours and of the game spend of Call of Duty in 2021." "SIE's recent development experience of shooter/battle royale games is limited and its main active shooter franchise is significantly less impactful than Call of Duty," Sony wrote. Watch on YouTube Newscast: Where does Microsoft go next to get its Activision Blizzard deal done?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |